http://www.thematrixfiles.net/blog/were-now-designing-to-1024-resolution/ a blog by Joanna Pineda, CEO, Matrix Group Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:21:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://www.thematrixfiles.net/blog/were-now-designing-to-1024-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-8399 Wygant Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:50:23 +0000 http://www.thematrixfiles.net/?p=190#comment-8399 nice header gratcia nice header gratcia

]]> http://www.thematrixfiles.net/blog/were-now-designing-to-1024-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-4119 Percy Sun, 05 Dec 2010 19:56:02 +0000 http://www.thematrixfiles.net/?p=190#comment-4119 That is most likely the most effective article that ever cross my reference. I don't see why anybody should disagree. It could be too simple #for them# to comprehend...anyway good work i'm coming again right here for More Great Stuff!! That is most likely the most effective article that ever cross my reference. I don’t see why anybody should disagree. It could be too simple #for them# to comprehend…anyway good work i’m coming again right here for More Great Stuff!!

]]> http://www.thematrixfiles.net/blog/were-now-designing-to-1024-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-532 Liz Norton Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:36:27 +0000 http://www.thematrixfiles.net/?p=190#comment-532 The optimal line length is interesting. For many years, terminal widths have been 80 characters (and I image still are in some cases). I wonder if this has anything to do with optimal line length, due to technological constraints at time of design, or both. Google, here I come. The optimal line length is interesting. For many years, terminal widths have been 80 characters (and I image still are in some cases). I wonder if this has anything to do with optimal line length, due to technological constraints at time of design, or both. Google, here I come.

]]> http://www.thematrixfiles.net/blog/were-now-designing-to-1024-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-488 Trevor Davis Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:12:58 +0000 http://www.thematrixfiles.net/?p=190#comment-488 Another reason for not designing any larger than 1024 is because line lengths will become unreadable. The optimal line length that I have heard is 72-95 characters. I think that 1024 will be the standard for quite some time. Another reason for not designing any larger than 1024 is because line lengths will become unreadable. The optimal line length that I have heard is 72-95 characters. I think that 1024 will be the standard for quite some time.

]]>